US has vital stake in India's rise as a global power

Describing India as an emerging "global power" and an "ally," US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says Washington has a "vital" stake in New Delhi's rise.

"India stands on the front lines of globalisation. This democratic nation promises to become a global power and an ally in shaping an international order rooted in freedom and the rule of law," Rice says after noting that Indo-US relations have experienced a "dramatic breakthrough" during the eight years of Bush Administration.

"...the United States has a vital stake in India's rise to global power and prosperity, and relations between the two countries have never been stronger or broader," Rice says in an article in the latest issue of Foreign Affairs magazine published by Council on Foreign Relations, a Washington think-tank.

"It will take continued work, but this is a dramatic breakthrough for both our strategic interests and our values," she says.

Penning her thoughts on foreign policy pursued by the George W Bush administration during the last eight years, Rice says Washington has placed importance to building strong relations with existing global players as well as emerging.

With those, particularly India and Brazil, the United States has built deeper and broader ties, she says.

On Brazil, she says the country's success at using democracy and markets to address centuries of pernicious social inequality has global resonance.

"Today, India and Brazil look outward as never before, secure in their ability to compete and succeed in the global economy.

"In both countries, national interests are being redefined as Indians and Brazilians realise their direct stake in a democratic, secure, and open international order -- and their commensurate responsibilities for strengthening it and defending it against the major transnational challenges of our era," Rice says.

The terror attacks on the US on September 11, 2001 was similar to the attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941, which fundamentally changed the world, she says.

"We were called to lead with a new urgency and with a new perspective on what constituted threats and what might emerge as opportunities. And as with previous strategic shocks, one can cite elements of both continuity and change in our foreign policy since the attacks of September 11."

"What has not changed is that our relations with traditional and emerging great powers still matter to the successful conduct of policy. Thus, my admonition in 2000 that we should seek to get right the "relationships with the big powers" -- Russia, China, and emerging powers such as India and Brazil -- has consistently guided us," Rice says.

Washington's alliances in the Americas, Europe, and Asia remain the pillars of the international order, she says, adding that the Bush administration was now transforming them to meet the challenges of a new era.

"In this strategic environment, it is vital to our national security that states be willing and able to meet the full range of their sovereign responsibilities, both beyond their borders and within them. This new reality has led us to some significant changes in our policy.

"We recognise that democratic state building is now an urgent component of our national interest," she said adding that in the broader Middle East, the US recognises that freedom and democracy are the only ideas that can, over time, lead to just and lasting stability, especially in Afghanistan and Iraq.