How can a bank like Lehman go down so fast?
ans- Financial markets can be punishing and reversal of fortunes can be dramatic. More so, if an institution is overleveraged — when loan and investment books are much, much bigger than its capital.
What compounds problems are strange accounting practice and high-risk nature of the loans and investments.
There are also disclosure issues: Lehman, in its last conference call with investors, gave no clue that it was actually on the brink.
------------------------------------------------------
How did the crisis build up?
ans- An investment bank uses its proprietary book (own money) to lend others and invest. It started with the subprime crisis. Banks like Lehman, buy mortgage loans from other banks, and then package them to sell bonds against the loan pool. Often they add cash to make the loan pool more attractive, so that the bonds can be sold at a higher price.
Suppose mortgage was earning 6%, these bonds are sold at 4%. The difference is the spread which the investment bank earns. By selling these structured bonds, it raises money and frees capital. But when homebuyers started defaulting, these bonds lost their value. It all began like this, and then the virus spreads across markets.
-------------------------------
But don’t investment banks play advisory role?
ans- They do, but slowly over the years, their prop books have multiplied.
Investment banks also organise big loans for their clients for funding acquisitions.
At times, investment banks take positions, only to palm off the securities to other clients and banks.
In a crisis, they may not get the opportunity to down-sell such positions. This adds to the panic.
------------------------------
Can’t central banks step in to stem the crisis?
ans- Well, they can and they have, to an extent. It’s precisely to discourage banks and bond houses from selling securities to generate liquidity, Fed has relaxed the rules under which it lends to institutions against securities.
Moreover, if there’s a financial chaos of this magnitude, banks refrain from lending each other, fearing that the money would get stuck.
A liquidity window from the central bank thus comes handy.
-------------------------------
How does the domino effect play out?
ans- Suppose Lehman faces a redemption and has to repay another bank it has borrowed from.
If it sells the mortgage-backed bonds, whose prices have fallen, it will not raise as much as was earlier expected.
So, it sells some of the other good assets or bonds which may have nothing to do with mortgages.
But since the bank starts dumping these assets, prices of these bonds also dip.
This is when the crisis spreads from subprime to prime.
---------------------------------------
How does it impact the balance-sheet?
ans- Herein lies the strange accounting of bonds and derivatives like mortgage-backed securities. All banks are required to mark-to-market (MTM) their investments.
So, if the price of an instrument falls, the difference between the price at which it was bought and the current market price has to be provided — meaning, it has to be deducted from the earnings.
So, a drop in price leads to the MTM loss. But there’s a bigger problem which really has deepened the crisis.
An MTM loss can be provided only if there’s a ‘market’. How do you provide when there is no market?
--------------------------------------------
But aren’t these instruments traded? How can the market suddenly vanish?
ans- Remember, it’s very different from checking the price of a stock from a stock exchange website. Many of the instruments are over-the-counter derivatives, which are struck on a one-to-one basis between two parties.
Suppose, a derivative is linked to variables like the yen-dollar rate, and may be prices of other actively-traded assets, say gold price and US Treasury bill.
What the bank does is construct a model, feeds the available market price of these variables in the computer, to arrive at what the market price of the derivatives could or should be.
This is an artificial model-generated price. This is called the mark-to-model against mark-to-market.
-----------------------------------------
So, what’s wrong in that?
ans- The trouble is when the bank actually goes out to sell the derivatives, it discovers that there are no takers. And, even if there are buyers, they are willing to pay just a fraction.
In other words, there is a sea of difference between the price that is being offered in the market and the high artificially-generated price thrown up by the model.
So, when the bank ends up selling the instrument or unwinding derivatives, the loss suffered is far in excess of the mark-to-model loss.
Such extra losses on thousands of securities and multiple portfolios can wipe out the capital of the bank.
--------------------------------------
What is the nature of the instruments?
ans- There are collateralised debt obligation (CDOs), credit default swaps (CDSs) and all kinds of derivatives. CDOs are asset (or loan)-backed securities, while CDSs are like a guarantee.
Say Bank A lends to a corporate but is unwilling to take the full credit risk. So, Bank A enters into a CDS deal with Bank B; under this, Bank B promises to pay Bank A if the corporate defaults. The money that Bank B earns for this is the CDS premium, which is similar to an insurance premium.
Now, if markets turn choppy, risks go up and so does the CDS premium. So, Bank B, which is earning a lower premium has to promote a mark-to-market loss against the CDS position.
--------------------------------------
How does one minimise such turmoil?
ans- No easy answer to that.
Maybe, some of the accounting norms need to be changed, so that the definition of MTM gets narrowed down.
Besides, to stop banks from going overboard, capital requirement may have to be raised for derivatives position.
But all this may be easier said than done.
- economictimes.com
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
How cos like Lehman Brothers become bankrupt:-
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Rupee posts biggest fall in a decade v/s US $
The rupee posted its biggest fall in a decade on Tuesday, hit by risk aversion and banks arbitraging a weaker offshore rate, although suspected central bank intervention stopped the slide just short of 47 per dollar.
The partially convertible rupee ended at 46.89/90 per dollar, off a trough of 46.99 which was its lowest since July 24, 2006.
The rupee fell 1.8 percent from its close of 46.05/06 on Monday, its biggest fall since May 14, 1998, according to Reuters daya, when the currency fell 2 percent after sanctions were imposed on India for its nuclear testing. One-month offshore non-deliverable forward contracts were quoting at 47.15/25, weaker than the onshore rate, indicating a bearish near-term outlook for the rupee.
That also created an arbitrage opportunity, where the dollar is bought against the rupee in the onshore market and sold in the offshore NDF market to exploit the price differential. "There are no (dollar) sellers in the market apart from the central bank. There is lot of oil, equity and NDF-related dollar demand, and even importers are covering near-term imports," said Madhusudan Somani, associate director of financial markets at Yes Bank.
"The rupee may test 47.20-25 levels in the near term," he added. Dealers said the central bank was seen selling dollars to halt the rupee's sharp decline, but sales were offset by demand for the US currency. At its low on Tuesday, the rupee was down 6.5 percent in September and more than 16 percent in 2008. Dealers estimated the central bank had sold $1.5-$2 billion to put a floor under the rupee on Tuesday.
Indian shares pulled out from a nosedive to end almost level on Tuesday after they had opened down 3.5 percent. Capital outflows from the local shares so far in 2008 total a net $8.4 billion, including $1 billion in September, a sharp turnaround from a record net inflows of $17.4 billion in 2007.
Traders said broad strength in the dollar versus other currencies overseas was also hurting sentiment on the rupee. The dollar steadied near 4-month lows versus the yen on Tuesday, but held gains against high yielders as investors took refuge in safe-haven assets following the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Real GDP growth in Q1 FY 09 at 7.9 pc-CMIE
The first quarter of this fiscal witnessed a real GDP growth of 7.9 per cent which is expected to accelerate further in the second half, an economic think-tank report said.
"Real GDP grew by 7.9 per cent in the first quarter of 2008-09. We expect the economy to accelerate in the second half of the fiscal," the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) said in its September monthly review.
The broad composition of the growth in the first quarter was - agriculture - three per cent, industry - 6.9 per cent and services - 10 per cent, CMIE said.
However, each of these were lower than the corresponding levels of growth in the year-ago quarter with the slowdown severest in industry, CMIE said.
"Within industry, mining and construction sectors reported healthy acceleration in growth," the report said.
Mining growth accelerated from 1.7 per cent in the previous year to 4.8 per cent in this year while in the case of the construction industry, the acceleration was from 7.7 to 11.4 per cent.
The manufacturing and utilities sectors saw a serious slowdown. "Growth in manufacturing slowed to 5.6 per cent in the first quarter of 2008-09 from the 10.9 per cent growth registered in the first quarter of 2007-08," CMIE said.
-Economic Times
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
India behind Pak in doing business: Report
For the fifth year in a row, Eastern Europe and Central Asia led the world in business reforms. However, so far as India is concerned, it still lags behind its neighbours on the ease of doing business.
This is the finding of the 'Doing Business Report 2009’ prepared jointly by the International Finance Corporation and the World Bank. Since 2004, Doing Business has been tracking reforms aimed at simplifying business regulations, strengthening property rights, opening up access to credit and enforcing contracts by measuring their impact on 10 indicator sets.
September Share Market Reviews
Nearly 1,000 reforms with an impact on these indicators have been captured. Eastern Europe and Central Asia has accounted for a third of them. The region surpassed East Asia and Pacific in the average ease of doing business in 2007—and maintained its place this year. Four of its economies—Georgia, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia—are among the top 30 in the overall Doing Business ranking.
India, however, slipped two notches to rank at 122nd, below its neighbours such as Nepal , Bangladesh and Pakistan which have been placed at 121st, 110th and 77th place, respectively, in the overall ranking. One interesting fact, however, being that even the neighbours have slipped this time from their previous rankings.
September Share Market Reviews
However, Singapore continues to rank at the top on the ease of doing business, followed by New Zealand, the United States and Hong Kong (China).
Five of the top 10 economies implemented reforms that had an impact on the Doing Business indicators in 2007/08. Singapore further simplified its online business start-up service. New Zealand introduced a single online procedure for business start-up, lowered the corporate income tax and implemented a new insolvency act. Hong Kong (China) streamlined construction permitting as part of a broader reform of its licensing regime. Denmark implemented tax reforms. And entrepreneurs in Toronto, Canada, can now start a business with just one procedure.
September Share Market Reviews
For many economies the reforms captured in Doing Business reflect a broader, sustained commitment to improving their competitiveness. Among these systematic reformers: Azerbaijan, Georgia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. France and Portugal among the OECD high-income economies. Egypt and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East and North Africa. India in South Asia. China and Vietnam in East Asia. Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico in Latin America. And Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mauritius, Mozambique and Rwanda in Africa.
Crude price slides below $100 a barrel
Price of Crude oil has slipped more then 27% since june 11 when it touched the highest ever $ 147 mark / barrel.
The price of crude oil produced by the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has plunged below $100 per barrel for the first time since late March, according to OPEC data released here on Wednesday.
On Tuesday, one barrel (159 litres) of OPEC-produced crude stood at $98.49, $2.59 less than the previous day's $101.08.
OPEC's latest price announcement came before its decision early Wednesday to cut overproduction.
OPEC calculates an average basket price based on 13 brands produced by cartel members.
A statement issued by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries issued after oil ministers ended their meeting early Wednesday said the organization agreed to produce 28.8 million barrels a day. OPEC President Chakib Khelil said that quota in effect meant that member countries had agreed to cut back 520,000 barrels a day in production over the established quota.
OPEC's statement on Wednesday noted that "prices had dropped significantly in recent weeks driven by a weakening world economy ... with its concomitant lower oil demand growth, coupled with higher crude supply, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar and an easing of geopolitical tensions." And it warned of the possibility of further price erosion, forecasting a possible "shift in market sentiment, causing downside risks to the global oil market outlook."
Oil demand from China's and India's booming economies have helped fuel oil demand and drive up prices.
At the next OPEC meeting on December 17, in Oran, Algeria, the organization would "reassess the market situation.
Since crude surged to a record $147.27 a barrel on July 11, it has tumbled by over $40, or more than 27 percent. Still, prices remain close to 14 percent higher this year than in 2007, and a barrel of benchmark crude still fetches four times what it did five years ago.
- Economic times
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Inflation down by 0.2%
Moderating global crude oil prices over the past few weeks worked behind 12.4 per cent inflation for the week ended August 16.Following dip in prices of vegetables, meat and cement, it is 0.2 per cent less than that in the previous week. Finmin considered inflation figure an early sign of moderation in prices.
It went on to reaffirm the fact that prices of most items in the WPI basket have either declined or remain unchanged and the annual rate of inflation in two of the three major commodity groups showed signs of moderation
Bse Closing rates
India may save $17 bn on oil fall
India is expected to save about USD 17 billion this fiscal on crude oil import bill due to fall in crude oil prices, currently hovering between USD 110-120 per barrel after nearly touching USD 150 per barrel mark, a study said. According to the industry body Assocham's Eco Pulse study on 'Crude Economics', the oil import bill for the current fiscal would have soared to USD 125 billion had crude oil prices remained at USD 145 per barrel level.
However, with the reversal in price movement, the import bill for crude oil would be restrained to USD 108 billion, it said.
Although, experts are still not sure whether the crude price decline would sustain in coming months, but so far it has shed almost 25 per cent after peaking to an all time high of USD 147.27 per barrel in July this year.
The study noted that oil prices have nosedived mainly on account of correction in demand, easing supply conditions and stronger US dollar.
The demand in the US, the biggest oil consumer has fallen sharply from 20.7 million barrels per day (mbpd) in 2007 to 19.88 mbpd in the first quarter of 2008, the chamber said.
In April-June this year, India's oil import bill stood at 25.5 billion dollars against 17 billion dollars during the corresponding period last year.
Fall in oil import bill will also help the government to bridge the trade deficit which rose to 30.4 billion dollars in the first three months of this fiscal.
The OECD-European countries have also registered a slowdown in demand from 15.28 mbpd in 2007 to 15.24 mbpd in the first quarter of this year.
Softening crude oil prices may come as a respite to the burgeoning current account deficit growing at an alarming rate mainly due to the rising crude oil bill.
Trade deficit for the first quarter of the fiscal (April-June 2008) widened 42 per cent on account of a 50.2 per cent rise in the oil imports. The oil import bill for Q1 08 stood at a whopping USD 25.5 billion on top of USD 17 billion in the same quarter last fiscal.
The economic forces at play in shrinking demand and improving supply facilities may cool down crude oil prices further which would lead to a narrower than estimated current account deficit, Assocham President Sajjan Jindal said.
Strengthening dollar has also played its role in cooling down the crude prices. The greenback has appreciated by as much as 6 per cent versus Euro in the last three months.
-economic times
Friday, July 18, 2008
Character of Left parties - Ridiculous -On Indo-US Deal
Left Parties (CPM and associates) are playing a spoilsport in Indo - US Nuclear Deal. Which will benefit India's Power crises and can bring an end to power crises for whole country.
but Left parties are against indian interests and so they withdrew their support to UPA government as they are against Indo- US deals.
Actually Left parties are funny parties who don't know how to work for interests of the country. by seeing past of all the Comminists parties it is clear that they are always against any deal with United States of America and India, whatso ever be the motive of the deal.
I mean to say if there is a deal to take place between Indian Government and USA then Left parties would always be against them. Instead if the same type of deal is taking place between India and any other country(China or UK especially)then Left parties would have never opposed that deal under any circumstance.
In previous general elections Left parties provided support to Congress government to stop BJP from making a government at center and in 2008 they withdrew support from UPA government to stop them to finalize the INDO - US Nuclear Deal, they have no moral values and are surely not thinking in the interest of indian Subcontinent. If they have understood each and every aspect of this deal then there is no reason to act against this deal which would end Power crises in india and would enter India's name along with likes of US, UK, Russia, China etc which are developed Countries. So here the question arises
Are Left parties against Development of India as a country????
Looking at present scenario of indian politics and biased opinion of left parties on Indo US Nuclear deal the answer to above question is YES.
Left Parties have some bias on deals with Russia or UK instead of USA so they are opposing the deal without thinking about the results and the hindrance which failure of the deal would provide in growth of India as superpower which is a dream of Sardar Manmohan Singh.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
What is Wealth Tax - Explained
Everyone having interest in Indian economy is fascinated by 'Wealth Tax' what it actually is??
so this post will sort every Ambiguity on this topic of wealth tax??
What is wealth tax?
Wealth tax is a tax levied on individuals, Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) and companies who possess net wealth in excess of INR 1.5 million on March 31st of every year. The Wealth tax law specifies a list of assets that will be considered to be part of the taxable wealth of the assessee. Broadly, house property, motor cars, jewellery, cash in hand subject to limits, urban land, yachts, boats and aircrafts are the assets that will be liable to wealth-tax in India. Principally, wealth tax is levied on non-productive assets of assesses, and thus the above assets, where used for commercial purposes, will be excluded from taxation. The current rate of wealth tax is 1 percent on the net wealth of the assessee, exceeding the threshold limit of INR 1.5 million.
The value of taxable assets for the purpose of wealth tax would be their value as on the last day of the respective financial year (FY). Further, such value of assets (except cash) will have to be determined in accordance with the valuation norms laid down in the Wealth Tax Act. In determining the value of the assets, debts owed by the assessee in respect of assets chargeable to tax are reduced from the taxable value of the assets. Thus, where you have purchased your brand new Mercedes on 'easy monthly installments', the outstanding value of the loan as at March 31 of the FY will go on to reduce the value of the motor-car in the wealth tax computation. Further, while the tax base for wealth tax is restricted to individuals, HUFs and companies; their interest in partnership firms/ association of persons (AOP) to the extent such firms/ AOPs possess specified assets is included in their net wealth and subjected to tax.
Exemptions and clubbing provisions:
In determining the wealth tax liability, one must be careful in examining whether an asset is liable to wealth-tax, as there are some exemptions that are available with respect to certain prescribed assets. For example, wealth-tax need not be paid in respect of one house of an individual/ HUF or on a plot of land which does not exceed 500 square metres. Neither does tax need be paid on any residential property that is let out for a minimum of 300 days in the relevant previous year, nor on any property which is held for business purposes. Motor cars that are held by an assessee for running them on hire or held as stock in trade are also not liable to wealth-tax. The same applies to jewellery that is held as stock in trade for the purpose of business. Other than the specified assets prescribed under the wealth tax law, no other assets such as investment in fixed deposits, shares or intangible property is subject to wealth tax in India.
It is also important to note that one cannot evade wealth tax by transferring ownership of taxable assets among family members with a view to disperse the value of such assets which could subsequently reduce the tax burden. When an asset is transferred to a spouse or a minor child of the individual, or to any other person for the benefit of his spouse or minor child, without adequate consideration, even if the ownership of that asset does not lie with the individual, he will be liable to pay wealth-tax with respect to those assets. Thus, the diamonds that you gift your wife on your anniversary, besides burning a hole in your pocket, will cause you to pay wealth tax, as the jewellery is deemed to be your wealth.
Filing of returns
The Indian wealth tax law requires every person subject to wealth tax in India to file a physical wealth tax return with the Income-tax authorities by July 31 (September 30 for companies) of the year following the FY. Another factor to consider is that while Indian residents are liable to pay wealth tax on their global wealth i.e. on those assets situated outside India too, but non residents including foreign companies are liable to pay tax only on assets situated in India.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
World's Strongest & Largest Economy list 2007-08
Finally Indian Economy managed to enter into league of World's trillion dollar economies .
According to the World Development Indicators released on July 1, India was a $1.17 trillion economy at the end of calendar 2007.
The US retained its pole position as the largest economy with GDP of $13.8 trillion. Following are names of the largest countries in terms of GDP.
The list of World's largest/strongest economies goes as shown below :
(Rank - Economy value in $)
1. - US
$13811.2 billion - 2007
$13163.9 billion - 2006
2. - JAPAN
$4376.7 billion - 2007
$4368.4 billion - 2006
3. - CHINA(People Republic of China)
$3297.2 billion -2007
$2896.9 billion -2006
4. - GERMANY
$3280.0 billion -2007
$2644.7 billion - 2006
5. - UK(United Kingdom)
$2727.8 billion - 2007
$2377.0 billion - 2006
6. - FRANCE
$2562.3 billion - 2007
$2248.1 billion - 2006
7. - ITALY
$2107.5 billion - 2007
$1851.0 billion - 2006
8. - SPAIN
$1429.2 billion - 2007
$1224.7 billion - 2006
9. - CANADA
$1326.4 billion - 2007
$1271.6 billion - 2006
10. - BRAZIL
$1314.2 billion - 2007
$1067.5 billion - 2006
11. - RUSSIA
$1291.0 billion - 2007
$987.0 billion - 2006
12. - INDIA
$1171.0 billion - 2007
$911.8 billion - 2006
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Crude oil may touch $175 a barrel by Diwali: Experts
Skyrocketing crude oil prices are likely to continue the upward march and could reach 175 dollar a barrel by Diwali unless there is significant decline in demand from growing economies, analysts say.
Crude oil prices have risen by about 40 dollars since March. Currently on New York Mercantile Exchange, oil traded near record high levels around 142 dollars.
"Considering the current situation and pace of price rise, crude oil rates may go up to 175 dollars per barrel in the global market. Prices may get fresh triggers, if Israel attacks Iran this year which would affect Mideast supplies," Religare Commodities Head (Commodity Business) Jayant Manglik told reporters.
High volatility spurred by uncertain geo-political tensions, slumping US economy and spiralling demand across the world would continue to support the already high crude oil prices, he said.
If you look at the technical chart, prices have moved upwardly in the last six months and we expect the bullish trend to continue further in the coming months. Prices may go beyond 175 dollars per barrel and touch 200 dollars per barrel," Mumbai-based Kotak Commodities Services Technical Analyst Dharmesh Bhatia said.
Amid the rising crude oil prices, there seem to be no respite for India and other countries, which are reeling under high inflationary pressure.
"Oil demand is rising higher than the supply. Although it is difficult to predict how much prices would inch up but they may rally in the range of 140-150 dollars per barrel,"Industry body Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) expert Anjan Roy said.
"Price rise is driving countries to look at alternative energy and conservation of energy. I think this would keep a check on a rise in additional demand for crude oil," Roy added.
According to experts, crude oil prices would decrease only when the demand falls significantly, which seems unlikely, or there is improvement in supply position. Currently, the global demand is approximately 87 million barrels a day against the supply of 82 million barrels a day.
"The prices will decline only when demand falls, of which there is no clear evidence so far. But when demand starts falling due to degrowth, prices will also decline and this will lead to a downward spiral with low prices and increased supply," Manglik said.
A similar scenario was witnessed in the late nineties when high crude prices punctured fast-growing South East Asian economies and led to a downward spiral, he said. Roy said the prices could be brought down only if the supply gap is addressed.
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
Govt taking steps to tame inflation - Finance Ministry
The federal government is taking steps to tame inflation that was mainly driven by high commodity prices, a finance ministry statement said on Tuesday.India's wholesale price index rose to 13-year high of 11.42 per cent in mid-June, after the government raised retail fuel prices by 10 per cent last month. "Though this is the highest inflation in the last 13 years, it is largely commodity centric. Government is taking measures to moderate the inflationary pressure," the statement said, without specifying.
Friday, June 27, 2008
India slips in global business climate ranking
India has slipped 13 places to 64th rank in a global list that measured business climate in 121 countries, as inflation and differences between the government and its Left allies dampened investor confidence. India has dropped from 51st place, whereas China is two notches down from last year's ranking at 79 in the Forbes list of 'best countries to do business. The list is topped by Denmark, climbing three spots from the previous year, followed by Ireland and Finland.
"India and China fell in this year's ranking as political instability demonstrated resistance to increasing personal freedoms. Higher inflation from food and other commodity costs, as well as increased burdens on entrepreneurs also held the world's most populous nations back as business destinations," Forbes said in an accompanying report.
Denmark, which rose three slots from last year, Ireland (up 19 places to No 2), Finland (up four to third place), the US (down three to fourth) and UK (up five to fifth). Big movers like Ireland, Estonia (No 10, up 24 spots) and Saudi Arabia (No 47, up 37) have limited bureaucracy standing in the way of entrepreneurs hoping to do business there. However, the world's largest economy United States declined one spot to the fourth place, whereas another economic giant United Kingdom retained its fifth position.
Pointing out that the Indian government has reduced controls on foreign trade and investment, Forbes said tariff spikes in sensitive categories, including agriculture, and incremental progress on economic reforms still hinder foreign access to India's vast and growing market.
"Privatisation of government-owned industries remains stalled and continues to generate political debate; populist pressure from within the UPA government and from its Left Front allies continues to restrain needed initiatives," the report noted. Forbes said that strong growth combined with easy consumer credit and a real estate boom fuelled inflation concerns in 2006 and 2007. This had led to a series of central bank interest rate hikes that have slowed credit growth and eased inflation concerns.
"The huge and growing population is the fundamental social, economic, and environmental problem," it said. Forbes analysed the business climates of countries, focusing on degrees of personal freedoms such as freedom of expression and right to participate in free and fair elections. "Investor protection examines the recourse held by minority shareholders in cases of corporate misdeeds, while corruption looks at the number and frequency of similar misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. Together with economic policies supportive of free trade and low inflation, these key points form a snapshot of countries' suitability for capital investment," the magazine said.
Developed countries like Germany (21st rank) and France saw declines in their respective rankings due to scandals in the banking sector and tougher barriers for entrepreneurs. One of the biggest falls came from Japan, which dropped to 24th rank from 21st position. On Japan, the report said, "... a Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy spelled out problems with the world's second-largest economy earlier this year. Among others, the committee's report cites the nation's 40 per cent corporate tax rate as uncompetitive compared with regional rivals like Hong Kong at 17.5 per cent and South Korea at 25 per cent."
Monday, June 23, 2008
"India's Biggest challenge is inflation " - P.Chitambaram
Finance Minister P Chidambaram considers inflation the country's biggest challenge today and regards becoming an open market as the way forward. Expressing concern at "the relentless rise" of crude oil, commodity and food prices, he put partial blame for the rising food prices on the "foolish" diversion of food to fuel. But he did not name the US, where food crops like corn are used for making ethanol. "Food prices have also been on the rise thanks to foolish diversion of food to fuel," he said, appearing on an hour-long special about India's business and economy - "India Rising: The New Empire" - on CNBC Sunday night.
Chidambaram also did not think that recent acts of terrorist violence would affect the investment climate in India. "Please remember, terrorist violence has affected bigger cities like London, Madrid, Tokyo, New York," he told the show host Erin Burnett discussing India's economic challenges. "If terrorist violence, terrorist action affects any city in India, it concerns all of us but that does not mean that investment has been jeopardised or is in peril," Chidambaram said. "India's biggest challenge now is inflation." India is building thousands of kilometres of roads, power plants, refineries and sea ports, he said referring to investment in infrastructure. "But surely the way forward is to become an open market."
Commerce and Industry Minister Kamal Nath, too, viewed infrastructure as "also a big challenge for us to keep pace with our growth." Infrastructure is just not roads, ports and airports, but also rural roads, which connect villages, drinking water, health and access to medical facilities. Envisaging large investment in infrastructure over the next five years, he said: "It is happening. We have to have huge investments in energy sector, ports.
So that's all happening, that's on the anvil." Asked how long controls on foreign investment would stay, Kamal Nath noted that retail is one of the very few sectors which are not open. "Rest are all absolutely open and we are taking in investments." Obviously because of liberalisation, foreign direct investment (FDI) had grown from $2.2 billion four years ago to 25 billion this year, he said. Asked if India could remain self-sufficient in food in view of its growing population, Kamal Nath said: "We have been self-sufficient except in edible oil and lentils, which are imported. And unless we have a monsoon failure, we don't see a problem even with these growing numbers."
Comparing India and China, the minister said: "We call ourselves the fastest growing free market economy. And there are differences in governance too." And while India's growth story is domestic market-driven, China's growth story is export market-driven. "But China has its own genius, we have our own genius," Kamal Nath said noting the two countries have good relations even as they compete with each other. Besides India's growth story, the CNBC special also featured a look at Tata Motors and the world's cheapest car, Indian movies, the world of call centres and Burnett practicing cricket with a team in India.
The programme also took a look at India's growing upper class, including the 60-storey house being built in Mumbai by the country's wealthiest man, Mukesh Ambani. And in stark contrast, it also took a quick glance at millions of India's homeless and others living in the world's biggest slum at Dharavi.
- Economic times
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Inflation to hit Indian Inc's growth plans - report
The 13-year-record inflation figures were announced on a day when Hindalco Industries announced its plan to retire loans taken to finance the Novelis acquisition. The Aditya Birla flagship company, which has about $3.03 billion as debt because of a bridge loan taken to fund the acquisition, will be tapping the market soon to meet the bridge payout.
“As long as we can pass on the cost to the market, it is ok,” managing director Debu Bhattacharya told reporters on Friday. “If we can’t, then it will be bad.” Inflation rate surged to a 13-year-high due to high crude and commodity prices, putting a question mark on growth estimates and on the ability of the Indian market to absorb any further increase in input costs.
“It’s (inflation) very unfortunate and certainly a thing that we can do without,” said Tata Sons’ finance director Ishaat Hussain. “But it has been driven by high oil and commodity prices, largely on account of external factors. It will require measures which will impact growth. Borrowing will become costlier and growth momentum will be affected.”
Indian companies, large and small, have drawn up large plans to expand capacities. Since borrowing will become costlier, the future of such expansion plans looks uncertain. However, the infrastructure sector may not be affected as deferring such projects would be even costlier.
India is scheduled to spend $500 billion to develop various infrastructure projects. B Hariharan, group finance director of the Gautam Thapar-controlled Ballarpur Industries, says “The high inflation will slow down the manufacturing sector. Although expansion projects will be affected, those that will be funded by domestic debt will be hard hit, while companies depending on foreign loans may be relatively better off,” he added.
On Thursday, KPMG said India would likely see the largest global investment in the manufacturing sector, with about 25% of large global corporates expected to invest in the country. Investment in other sectors such as in industrial products, will also be large, with India likely to displace the US to gain the second rank after China, said the report, which was based on a survey of 300 corporate investment strategists from 15 economies